Skip navigation

it is within my power to kill myself and to kill others. in short, i have the choice of ending life. we all have the choice of ending life. to destroy is a will striving within us all. we must fight this wretch beneath our breast. we must wrest this daemon from our souls!

the scientist of an unknown age will tell us that our efforts were in vain. that parts of our brains are in fact immovable movers. we must resist! Holy! one must resist - for the sake of life we shall die!

and for the sake of truth we shall live!

the selfish-will, that is also cunning, can endure the most selfless acts as long as they are a means for its desires – it is within this mask which the many hide. one must learn to spot this devious will as a great deal of high praises have been unduly heaped upon the many: these are the great deceivers, those which learn to master this selfish-will, to tame and manipulate it. to create a morality out of one’s immorality –  a laughable atrocity.

suppose one has before him: a starving child to his left and a starving dog to his right? one must choose which he shall feed, for he has but enough for one. which shall he choose? a person would hastily feed the child, without thought of the other! – there is but one choice, the other is unthinkable before a human. yet, this occurs in mass? one must check his premises – a person would choose humanely, thus within the race – a monstrous breed must be lurking.

my dear! look at all the poor rotten animals in this world, starving! and the foundations which house these wretched animals do such a wonderful job coaxing us to throw our money as if in fever – to bring these cheerless creatures back to vigour?  if only we could have seen the children that starved in their stead, children brought to beings lower than dogs, might we have thrown our money so foolishly?

in the study of morality, the high-minded have deemed all goodness as sociological phenomenon; that virtue is a thing to satisfy a particular social end: man is virtuous not for virtue alone, as there is not such, but for the advantage of oneself: virtue is merely a means. this may be true for most, as i indeed perceive this in most, but for those whom know morality as a thing beyond any personal or societal beneficence, those that would rather be exiled or burned at the stake rather than live as swine! we shall think of no means! we shall do those things that are contrary to human nature unfeigned! for true morality is not a thing constructed for the good of all – but it is the good alone.

science is a system of explaining and practicing of what is inherent in the world and consequently of humanity – morality is a thing contrary to human nature, i.e. true morality.

there will come a time when man will not live for the people near him, but for people the reverse his location. he shall never leave his dwelling and no longer have true human contact, but his neglect will be justified by his electronic aid to hurting africans.

the ignorance of the scientist lay within his lack of inward thought – he cannot imagine the roads in which he paves but only its components.

science is now as the child in puberty and alas! its parents seem to have given countenance to any temperament of behaviour. just as the maximally spoiled child science too wants all things. i say it is now time for its parents to give guidance and restriction before it casts itself to ruins as a whoring philanderer, if not, it will die, but not before it has ruined all that love it.

the striving to live is a thing borne within the hearts of the half-man.

those that hold themselves to the strictest measure of science are but half-men! we that know this to be true are not seekers of meaning nor life, rather we are the holders meaning and we are life!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.